Groundwork SourcingChina production control
Groundwork SourcingOn-the-ground production control & full-cycle QC in China

QC Inspection Report

Stretch pants & shorts  ·  Inspected 18 Feb 2026  ·  First run rejected · re-produced · re-inspected · shipped
01 — Order
Buyer / brand
Withheld
PO / order ref
Withheld
Product
Stretch pants — long & shorts
Style / SKU
Withheld
Order qty
Withheld
Colourways / sizes
Black, grey, khaki, charcoal · M–5XL
Ship window
Shipped after re-production

Factory name, address, contact, licence no. and any signage, machine plates or lot stickers visible in photos. Keep them in the internal copy; never in the buyer copy or the public specimen.

02 — Inspection scope
Stage
IPQC — first production run
Date(s) on site
18 Feb 2026
Inspected by
QC inspector, Groundwork team — on the floor
Party
Groundwork — on site, in person
Sampling standard
ISO 2859-1 (AQL)
Inspection level
GII
AQL — critical / major / minor
0 / 2.5 / 4.0

Baseline scope is included, not billed. Deeper inspection (3rd-party PSI, lab test, 100% sorting, tightened AQL) is billed at the inspector's actual invoice — no markup — and is itemised in section 07.

03 — Sampling result

Defects found against accept/reject limits

ClassDefinitionAllowed (Ac)FoundResult
CriticalUnsafe or unsellable; regulatory failure00Pass
MajorWould cause return, complaint or markdown5 of 8 typesReject
MinorVisible deviation, unlikely to be rejected
☐ Pass ☐ Hold — rework & re-inspect ☑ Fail — do not ship

Defects were not isolated to a sample — pocket direction was wrong on every colourway and rise seam misalignment appeared on almost every unit checked. That makes this a run-level fault, not a sampling result, so it was escalated as a reject rather than a sort.

04 — Defect schedule

The eight defect types we inspect against.

These are the categories written into our production contracts, so a finding here is not a matter of opinion — it is a contractual defect the factory is obliged to correct.

#TypeWhat counts as a defectFoundClass
1SewingPocket seams run in the wrong direction — left and right mismatched on every colourway. Rise seam misaligned on almost every sample checked. Hem sewing defective. Belt sewing defective. Finishing after sewing poor at hem, side pocket and belt.YesMajor
2FabricFabric dents / press marks. Cut line at the hem is not consistent.YesMajor
3Dyeing & colourNot raised on this inspection.
4MeasurementLeft and right leg lengths differ by 1.5–2 cm. Total length off by 2 cm on black and on grey, in opposite directions. Shorts short by 1.5–2.5 cm on both thigh and length. Grey M and L measure identically. See section 05.YesMajor
5Print & embroideryNot applicable to this style.
6TrimsBelt punching defective.YesMajor
7ContaminationForeign matter sewn into seams. Heavy contamination across khaki and charcoal. General soiling throughout.YesMajor
8PackingNot reached — goods did not pass to packing.

Liability: any defect arising from a specification changed without the buyer's prior written approval is the factory's responsibility to correct, per contract.

05 — Measurements

Tolerance: 3% of spec.

Anything outside ±3% is a measurement defect under section 04 item 4, not a judgement call.

Point of measureSpec±3% bandFoundDev.P/F
Total length — blackper spec±3%−2.0 cm−2.0 cmFail
Total length — greyper spec±3%+2.0 cm+2.0 cmFail
Leg length, left vs rightsymmetric±3%1.5–2.0 cm apart1.5–2.0 cmFail
Shorts — thighper spec±3%−1.5 to −2.5 cm−1.5–2.5 cmFail
Shorts — lengthper spec±3%−1.5 to −2.5 cm−1.5–2.5 cmFail
Hem — black shorts 5XLper spec±3%+2.0 cm+2.0 cmFail
Grade break — grey M vs Lgraded±3%no differencegrading absentFail

Measure to the buyer's point-of-measure list where one exists; otherwise to the approved sample. Record what was measured, not what was expected.

06 — Defects found, and what we did

Caught, corrected, verified.

DefectClassQtyCorrective actionRe-check result
Pocket seam direction wrong — left/right mismatchedMajorAll colourwaysDefective units pulled and returned to the factory; re-production orderedPassed re-inspection
Belt sewing defectiveMajorRecurringReturned to factory; instructed to re-produce if rework could not hold the ship datePassed re-inspection
Rise seam misalignedMajorNearly all samplesReturned to factory with the defective unitsPassed re-inspection
Measurement out of the 3% band (see §05)MajorMultiple sizesRe-production ordered — grading corrected, not reworkedPassed re-inspection
Foreign matter in seams; general soilingMajorKhaki, charcoalReturned to factoryPassed re-inspection
Belt punching defectiveMajorRecurringReturned to factoryPassed re-inspection
Pocket seam running the wrong direction
Pocket seam — wrong direction
Poor finishing at a sewn seam
Finishing after sewing
Defective waistband seam
Waistband seam
Defective hem seam
Hem seam
Uneven gathering at the waistband
Uneven gathering
Defective belt punching
Belt punching
Soiling on the fabric face
Soiling
Fabric puckering along a seam
Fabric puckering
Shorts length measured against a tape
Measured, not estimated

Re-inspection: the re-produced lot was checked again before release. All six findings above cleared, and the goods shipped. Re-inspected 25 Feb 2026 — seven days after the first inspection.

Photographs are from the first inspection — the state the goods were rejected in. Buyer, style and factory identifiers are withheld; findings and measurements are unaltered.

07 — Inspection billing (at cost)
Line itemDetailCost
Baseline IPQCIncluded in our service — not billed$0
3rd-party PSINot required — caught in-process$0
Lab test / sortingNot required at this stage$0
Groundwork's markupOn every line above$0
Total billed to buyerBaseline IPQC only — nothing beyond it was needed$0

Attach the inspector's own invoice to this report. If nothing beyond baseline was run, this section reads $0 and still gets sent.

08 — Verdict

Shipping decision

☑ Approved to ship — after re-production and re-inspection ☐ Approved after rework — re-inspected ☐ Held — not shipped

Summary

Five of the eight contract defect types were present, and two of them — pocket seam direction and rise seam alignment — appeared across every colourway rather than in isolated units. Measurements failed the 3% band in both directions, and grey M and L came off the line at identical measurements, meaning the grading had not been applied at all.

The first run was rejected. Defective units were pulled and returned to the factory with the findings above, and the factory was instructed to re-produce rather than rework wherever rework would not hold the shipping date. Nothing from that run was released to the buyer.

The re-produced lot was inspected again before release. All six findings cleared and the goods shipped. The buyer received the corrected production, not the first run — which is the entire point of inspecting during production rather than after it.
QC inspector, Groundwork team  ·  18 Feb 2026
Inspected by — who checked the goods
Sang, Groundwork Sourcing  ·  18 Feb 2026
Released by — who made the ship / hold call

Inspection and release are signed by different people, so the person who checks the goods is not the person who clears them to ship.

Groundwork Sourcing · On the ground — Yiwu, Zhejiang, China · hello@groundworksourcing.com · groundworksourcing.com

This is what we send you. Every order.

Share one or two products and we'll come back with a cost-down and risk read — and this is the documentation that follows once you're in production.

Get a free cost-down + risk read